Convincing people to accept "tax choice" and "tax earmarking" requires a multifaceted approach.

Education: The primary step is to educate taxpayers about tax choice and tax earmarking and how they can benefit the community. Explain that tax choice allows taxpayers to decide where their tax money goes, while tax earmarking ensures certain funds go to specific projects or areas.

Transparency: Implementing a system that shows where tax dollars are being used can help people see the direct impact of their tax contributions. The more people see their tax dollars at work, the more likely they will accept this system.

Demonstrate effectiveness: Show examples where this kind of system has been effective. This could be smaller-scale implementations or theoretical examples illustrating how such a system would work.

Address concerns: Understand and address taxpayers' concerns about this system. For example, some may worry that popular but not necessarily vital programs will be funded while less popular but necessary services might be overlooked. Address this by implementing some safeguards, such as a minimum level of funding for all vital services.

Empowerment: This system gives taxpayers a say in where their money goes. This empowerment might make taxpayers feel more involved in the decision-making process.

Technically, implementing tax choice and tax earmarking might be achieved through a digital platform or online portal where taxpayers could allocate their tax dollars to different categories. However, there are some technical challenges to this:

Infrastructure: An efficient, secure, and user-friendly platform must be developed. It should be able to handle a large amount of data and maintain the privacy and security of taxpayer information.

Allocation and tracking: The system must be designed to track the allocation of taxes and ensure that they are used as intended.

Administration: This new approach would require a significant administrative change. Governments would need to set up departments or teams responsible for overseeing the process and resolving any issues that may arise.

Legal changes: Changes in tax laws would be required to permit tax choice and earmarking. This would likely involve a lengthy legislative process.